Written by Philip Pullman
For those of you unaware, ‘His Dark Materials’ is the name for the Golden Compass, the Subtle Knife and the Amber Spyglass trilogy. I have read these books before but after the hub-bub of the movie I thought it would be fun to refresh my memory. And since I read all three of them back to back and within a week I thought I’d lump them all together and write one big rant about everything. So hold on tight.
Once deemed “The most dangerous author in all Britain” Pullman is certainly not shy about his opinion when it comes to religion. I don’t think that the ‘His Dark Materials’ series is subversive when it comes to the Church because it doesn’t pussy-foot around and pretend to be something it’s not – Religion and those on the side of “the Church” are the bad guys.
However, unless you knew what was coming up in later books, you wouldn’t get a grasp of his anti-religious views from The Golden Compass (the first book). There just isn’t enough of the plot revealed to let on.
Now, don’t get me wrong, I love these books. It took me all of two days to finish the first one (and that’s because I’m slow-witted and pregnant at the moment) I’m not intrinsically a religious person so the anti-church views don’t run contrary to any core beliefs I hold. In fact, I like the ideas that he introduces later that supplant the idea of needing a Church and religious doctrine to tell people what to think and how to act. And I think that anyone open-minded enough should be able to see a different view from the norm and enjoy it for what it is: just a different view.
And that’s where I’d be wrong of course. Religion is a banner that has rallied around for millennia and has therefore has the unique ability to drain all the open-mindedness out of any situation. Pro or con, people tend to get very agitated when an opposing view is stated.
I work with a woman that is extremely religious. She finds it very difficult to allow a conversation to take place in front of her that even slightly challenges her beliefs (and I’m including the time I tried to simply explain a bit about Hinduism). Not that she proselytizes; she’s very considerate about not letting on how obvious it is that we are all going to hell. But she definitely feels the need to remind everyone that she BELIEVES in the bible and what everyone else is talking about is certainly not something with which she would agree, should her opinion be solicited. Which, shockingly, it is usually not.
Now, I understand where she is coming from but the constant reminder that she, personally, doesn’t approve of such things, makes me sad because she misses out on so many wonderful things. Not the least of which is the His Dark Materials trilogy.
Controversial views or not, there is no doubt that Pullman is an incredible writer. The plot construction is inventive and peppered with twists that seem a bit incredible at first but quickly become reality for the main characters. It would be unfair to explain over much about the plot because it really is a wonderful story which I would hate to ruin. Yes, you know that the Church is the bad guy but everyone knows that by now – hell, even the woman I work with knows that which is why she’ll never read these books.
One last thing and I’ll get off my soapbox/high horse: Many people rant about how inappropriate these books are for children. I have asked children what they think about these books and the overwhelming answer is “They’re Grrrrreat!” But when asked if they understood about all the religion and God etc… the usual response is something along the lines of “Meh” coupled with a blank stare.
I’m not saying these books won’t influence anyone – I could never assume to know that. What I will say is that children have much more intelligence than adults generally credit them. I tend to think children have a better read on the world than we, as adults are capable of gleaning. With this view in mind, I propose that most of the fuss over these “heretical” books stems from how adults interpret these books and impose their own ideas onto children.
But then again what do I know?
Follow up note:
As my loving husband pointed out to me, I have unwittingly put people into two categories here:
A) Religious nut-job
Or
B) Going to hell.
For this I must apologize.
As Brian so kindly put it
What about all those religious people out there that do have open minds and are willing to listen to the other side?
For those people I must say, you did not cross my mind when writing the above rant and I apologize. I did not have you in mind when I spoke of rigid beliefs and inability to accept that which is foreign to those beliefs. In fact, I can honestly say that you blend in so well with the fabric of a normal society that many people do not think of you as outstanding in many ways though clearly, you are. To be able to hold any belief, no matter how strange it may seem to another, while at the same time credit another person for questioning that belief is truly an incredible skill. To be able to recognize the importance of those questions and yet stay true to yourself is not an easy thing. And to those of you that do this every day I applaud you. It is people such as yourself that make society tolerable and conversation lively.